Andy Abramson points out a story in economist.com. As he says, the platform may be high-browed and intellectual but the story is certainly sensational. It is clear that the correspondent (who writes in “professional” third person with no clear identification) needs a bit more exposure to telephony and the editors have not done their job. And I am not talking about the regulatory matters at all, of which I plead ignorance.
Here are some of the pearls that I hope don’t require any further explanations:
Of course the biggest omission is that this correspondent fails to point out that most of the VoIP providers fail to deliver on the promises of VoIP. For example, SIP provides for the caller to indicate the subject of the call. Can you imagine an email client that does that? But most of the VoIP clients do not have this capability. And the list goes on. I think this is “the big hang-up”. After all the historical high cost of PSTN calls is not news anymore – it has been taken over by events.
Posted by aswath at December 1, 2007 02:18 PM
Amen. The PSTN has been digital for decades (with statistical multiplexing, aggregation and compression). Too me, the most infuriating aspect of the article is that VoIP makes all these features (3WC, CLID, CFW) easier. The reality is that seperation of signaling from bearer is the most profound enabler to these new features.
Hey VoIP guys, where are my purple minutes!
Posted by: Todd Spraggins at December 3, 2007 12:13 PMI would say that separation of signaling from bearer has been achieved by ISDN or ADSI of yore. Th real differentiator is the fact the two ends can signal directly to each other with out the need for any intermediary.
Posted by: Aswath at December 3, 2007 01:39 PM